SAMPLE LETTERS
 

 

"Every reform, however necessary, will by weak minds be carried to an excess, that itself will need reforming."--Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Provided below are sample letters to Congresspersons and Senators.  You may use "as is" or you may tailor these to say what it is you wish to say.  You may even write your own letter, entirely.  What is important is that you write.  Hard copy letters still, today, have greater impact than e-mails.  Should you wish to e-mail, you may do so through the APWU Congressional Information Center.   If you "cut & paste" these letters, you may wish to save them, first, as "text only" using the pull-down "properties" menu on your computer's clipboard.

DEAR POSTAL CUSTOMER (from the Austin Texas Local)

Postal Worker (new)

USPS Supporter (new)

Postal Worker

Postal Worker--Short Letter

Supporter of USPS

Senior Citizen Supporter of USPS

Letter to the Editor

Postal Worker--Long version of the Short Letter

Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor

Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor (variation)

Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor (USPS supporter)

Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to Legislators

LEGISLATIVE RESOURCE PAGE

WRITING TIPS  

Postal Worker (new)


The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

As a postal worker and a citizen, I am writing to express my concerns about several potentially drastic changes that the President's Commission on the Postal Service has recommended in their final report, which was completed on July 31, 2003. The report endorses a drastic overhaul of the nation's mail system. The recommendations intend only to serve the needs of big advertising mailers at the expense of the American people.

The report proposes giving the Postal Service unfettered authority to close 'low activity' post offices without first seeking citizen involvement. This power to close local post offices would be a disaster for small businesses and for rural America.

This Commission also proposes to give broad authority to a politically-appointed Postal Regulatory Board to set postage rates, define the scope of universal service, amend the postal monopoly, set wages and benefits, and review and act on complaints. The Commission would give this board unprecedented authority, with no accountability.

The Postal Service's mission has always been to bind the nation together by providing service and access to all communities at uniform rates. Undermining that mission would be detrimental to the elderly, to rural and inner-city residents who don't live in areas deemed profitable by the Postal Service and corporate mailers, to the poor, and to millions of other citizens and small businesses who depend on affordable postal services.

If presented as a legislative package, I would urge you to vote against these proposals.

Thank you for your interest and consideration.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)

USPS Supporter (new)


The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

The President's Commission on the United States Postal Service has recommended the closure of small post offices with low activity. This would threaten the existence of post offices in rural and inner city areas and threaten affordable and dependable access to postal services for citizens in those areas. They also recommend redefining -- and weakening the tenant on which the Postal Service was founded by Benjamin Franklin, universal service. Universal service provides for the same postal services at uniform rates for all Americans six days a week.


I am opposed to legislation based on any of the President's Commission's recommendations, because it would threaten the quality postal services consumers depend upon.



Thank you,
(Provide Name and Address)

BACK TO TOP

 

Sample Letter #1 --Postal Worker (long letter)


The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

As a postal worker and a citizen, I am writing to express my concerns about several potentially drastic changes that the President's Commission on the Postal Service has recommended for our nation's mail system.

As you may know, the commission was named by President Bush in December 2002 to consider sweeping changes to the Postal Service, which has suffered deficits in the last three years due to declining mail volume caused by the nation's economic slump, the terrorist attacks of 9-11, and the anthrax attacks. Postal revenues are also being sapped by below-cost discounts that the Postal Service gives to corporate mailers for presorting their mail. Despite recent shortfalls, the Postal Service projects a profit for this fiscal year. And it continues to provide the world's most efficient, affordable, dependable, and extensive postal services.

Nonetheless, the President's commission, charged with recommending wide-ranging changes to the Postal Service, has proposed closing unprofitable postal facilities including those in rural communities and in inner-city neighborhoods, reducing customer services and ending the universal service mandate that has served our country well for 227 years. The commission has also recommended a process that, if followed, would surely guarantee an end to uniform postal rates -- linking postage prices to where people live and where they are sending their mail. Large businesses and advertisers would be granted preferential rates at the expense of small businesses and ordinary citizens.

The Postal Service's mission has always been to bind the nation together by providing service and access to all communities at uniform rates. Undermining that mission through any of the measures above would be detrimental to the elderly, to rural and inner-city residents who don't live in areas deemed profitable by the Postal Service and corporate mailers, to the poor, and to millions of other citizens and small businesses who depend on affordable postal services. As a public servant, I treat every customer equally; the Postal Service must do the same if it is to remain a public service.

As a matter of personal interest, I also implore you to oppose any effort to roll back postal workers' collective bargaining rights. I work hard under very trying circumstances for the modest, yet stable income I need to help support my family and the promise of basic benefits when I retire. I invite anyone who thinks I am overcompensated to spend a day with me on the job.

The Postal Service does not need radical reforms currently being considered by the president's commission. A survey of the American people, solicited by the commission, shows that Americans are pleased with the Postal Service as is.  In fact, the survey shows that their only concerns are those caused by the service cut-backs that have already occurred (e.g. long lines and earlier collection times).  I urge you to consider my concerns when Congress debates postal reform legislation.

Thank you for your interest and consideration.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)
 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #2--Postal Worker (short letter)


The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

I am writing you about a matter of serious concern to all Americans.

The President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service, appointed in December 2002, has recommended a major overhaul of the nation's mail system. In a report  to President Bush, the commission  recommended drastic changes in mail service -- changes that would result in increased postage costs, curtailed services for individuals and small businesses, and restrictions on collective bargaining for postal employees.

I am concerned that such changes would have a devastating effect on the mission of the Postal Service: to bind our nation together by providing service and access to all -- the residents of rural areas and inner cities, the elderly, communities both rich and poor and the businesses that serve them.

As a postal employee, I am worried about any changes that would weaken the Postal Service, which plays an important role in American life. I urge you to evaluate the effect any proposals would have on postal service to the nation, on the institution itself, and on postal workers.

I urge you to consider my concerns when Congress debates postal reform legislation.

Thank you for your interest and consideration.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)
 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #3--USPS support

 

The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,
 

I am writing about the President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service, which has recommended major changes for the nation's mail system. These recommendations, if enacted into law, could result in increased postage costs and reduced services.

I rely on the Postal Service to pay bills, conduct business, and correspond with family and friends.

I am concerned that changes to the Postal Service will make it more difficult for me to use the mail. In addition, I am concerned about the loss our community will experience if our post office is closed, or if its hours of operation are reduced.

Please oppose any attempts to weaken the Postal Service.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)

 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #4--Senior Citizen support


The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

I am writing to you about the President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service, which has recommended major changes to the mail system. These recommendations could result in increased postage costs and reduced services.

As a senior citizen, I rely on the Postal Service to pay bills, conduct business, and correspond with family and friends.

I am concerned that changes to the Postal Service will force me to wait longer for the mail, including prescription drugs, I rely on every day.

Please oppose any attempts to weaken the Postal Service.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)

 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #5--Letter to the Editor

 

To the Editor:

Recently, some members of a virtually unnoticed Presidential commission reviewing the U.S. Postal Service said in a public hearing that they wanted to make a "big bang" with their recommendations.  That "bang," under the guise of solving the Postal Service's short-term financial problems, could result in profound changes in when, where, and how Americans get mail--as well as how much we pay for it.

The commission has recommended easing the Postal Service's universal service mandate, which could mean reducing the number of days per week mail gets delivered, closing less profitable post offices in rural and inner-city communities, charging substantially higher rates for postal services, and scaling back post offices' hours.

The  U.S. Postal Service has a rich history of providing a public service that has connected people, communities, and businesses with one another for nearly 230 years.  For millions of Americans who do not have on-line access to information--especially the elderly, the poor, and those who live in remote areas--the Postal Service is an absolute necessity.  Replacing its public service obligation with a profit-seeking mandate that suits business and advertising mailers at the expense of the general public is bad public policy.  We need to vigorously oppose any efforts to "reform" the Postal Service by rewarding corporate mailers at the expenses of ordinary citizens and small businesses.

Sincerely,

(Provide Name, Address and Phone Number)

 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #6--Postal Worker (long version of the short letter)

 

The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,
 

I am writing you about a matter of serious concern to all Americans.

The President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service, appointed in December 2002, has recommended a major overhaul of the nation's mail system. In its final report, the commission has recommended drastic changes in mail service -- changes that would result in increased postage costs, curtailed services for individuals and small businesses, and restrictions on collective bargaining for postal employees.

I am concerned that such changes would have a devastating effect on the mission of the Postal Service: to bind our nation together by providing service and access to all -- the residents of rural areas and inner cities, the elderly, communities both rich and poor and the businesses that serve them.

As a postal employee, I am worried about any changes that would weaken the Postal Service, which plays an important role in American life. I urge you to evaluate the effect any proposals would have on postal service to the nation, on the institution itself, and on postal workers.

Changes recommended by the commission could have a negative effect on service for residents of our state.  These include closing "unprofitable" post offices in rural areas and in inner-city communities and discontinuing "unprofitable" post offices in rural areas and in inner-city communities.  Additionally, while not directly calling for an end to universal service, the final report seems to suggest that, in the commission's view, universal service should not continue if it is not profitable.

The cost of postage could skyrocket, just as telephone rates and cable TV fees have since those industries were deregulated.  Consumers could be forced to pay different amounts, depending on where they live and where they send their mail, and complicated payment plans could replace uniform rates.  Large businesses and advertisers could be granted preferential rates at the expense of small businesses and ordinary citizens.

The changes recommended by the commission could jeopardize the future of the institution that has served our country for 227 years.  They could endanger the vast network that unites our nation, and serves individuals and commerce without regard to their economic status or location.

I am also concerned that, if the commission's report is enacted into law, the privacy of all Americans may be compromised, as the commission has strongly recommended a tracking system which would eliminate the ability of citizens to correspond with anonymity.

More than 700,000 postal employees could lose the right to collective bargaining.  We could suffer a loss of wages, a reduction in health and retirement benefits, and a loss of job security.

I urge you to consider my concerns when Congress debates postal reform legislation.

Thank you for your interest and consideration.


Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)

 

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #7--Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor:

As part of an ill-advised cost-cutting scheme, the U.S. Postal Service is planning to close its Mail Processing and Distribution Center in______________.  If the ______________ plant is closed, mail for the ____(region)___ will likely be trucked to __________________ to be processed and sorted, then transported back to ___________________ for distribution.

The Postal Service pleads poverty, even though it reported a $1 billion profit in the first quarter of its 2003 fiscal year.  But it still intends to close mail processing plants, and it is contemplating other severe cutbacks in the service it provides to the American people.

The root causes of the Postal Service's recent financial difficulties are twofold:  the economic slump, which caused a temporary decrease in mail volume, and a flawed postage rate structure that grants large business mailers and advertisers below-cost discounts.

The Postal Service should stop giving money away to big business and keep the ____________ Mail Processing facility where it is.  That way it would be able to continue to provide quality service to the small businesses and ordinary citizens that rely on it.

 

Sincerely,

(Provide Name, Address and Phone Number)

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #8--Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor (variation)

Letter to the Editor:

As part of an ill-advised cost-cutting scheme, the U.S. Postal Service is planning to close its Mail Processing and Distribution Center in______________.  If the ______________ plant is closed, mail for the ____(region)___ will likely be trucked to __________________ to be processed and sorted, then transported back to ___________________ for distribution.

The Postal Service pleads poverty, even though it reported a $1 billion profit in the first quarter of its 2003 fiscal year.  But it still intends to close mail processing plants, and it is contemplating other severe cutbacks in the service it provides to the American people.

In this time of high gas and energy prices, I fail to see how the Postal Service will save money by needlessly transporting the mail to kingdom come and back.  And I'm sure this plan can not result in faster mail delivery or improved service.

The root causes of the Postal Service's recent financial difficulties are twofold:  the economic slump, which caused a temporary decrease in mail volume, and a flawed postage rate structure that grants large business mailers and advertisers below-cost discounts.

The Postal Service should stop giving money away to big business and keep the ____________ Mail Processing facility where it is.  That way it would be able to continue to provide quality service to the small businesses and ordinary citizens that rely on it.

 

Sincerely,

(Provide Name, Address and Phone Number)

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #9--Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to the Editor (USPS supporter)

Letter to the Editor:

As part of an ill-advised cost-cutting scheme, the U.S. Postal Service is planning to close its Mail Processing and Distribution Center in______________.  If the ______________ plant is closed, mail for the ____(region)___ will likely be trucked to __________________ to be processed and sorted, then transported back to ___________________ for distribution.

As a  (resident/local businessman or woman) of this community, I worry about the effect such a move will have on the local economy.  Undoubtedly, many of the employees of the plant, valuable members of this community themselves , will be forced to move.  Local businesses will likely see an immediate drop in revenue.  Property values could even suffer if a large portion of our community's middle-class families relocate.

The Postal Service pleads poverty, even though it reported a $1 billion profit in the first quarter of its 2003 fiscal year.  But it still intends to close mail processing plants, and it is contemplating other severe cutbacks in the service it provides to the American people.

The root causes of the Postal Service's recent financial difficulties are twofold:  the economic slump, which caused a temporary decrease in mail volume, and a flawed postage rate structure that grants large business mailers and advertisers below-cost discounts.

The Postal Service should stop giving money away to big business and keep the ____________ Mail Processing facility where it is.  That way it would be able to continue to provide quality service to the small businesses and ordinary citizens that rely on it.

 

Sincerely,

(Provide Name, Address and Phone Number)

BACK TO TOP

Sample Letter #10--Plant Closing/Consolidation Letter to Legislators

The Honorable
U.S. Senate/House of Representatives
Local office address (do not direct to DC offices)

Dear Senator/Representative ______________,

As you may know, the U.S. Postal Service is planning to close its ________________Mail Processing and Distribution Center in __________________.

Closing this plant will have a dramatic effect on service in the area, including substantial delays in mail delivery.  In addition, closing a mail processing plant could have a serious effect on the local economy as stable, middle-class jobs disappear.

For many people in our district--especially senior citizens--the U.S. Postal Service provides the only inexpensive and reliable means for communicating with friends and family and conducting business.  For those on the wrong side of the "digital divide," delayed or curtailed postal services could have a negative social and economic impact.

The Postal Service reported a $1 billion profit in the first quarter of its 2003 fiscal year, but it still intends to close mail processing plants as part of an ill-advised cost-cutting scheme.  It is also contemplating other severe cutbacks in the services it provides to the American people.

The root causes of the Postal Service's recent financial difficulties are twofold:  the economic slump, which caused a temporary decrease in mail volume, and a flawed postage rate structure that grants below-cost discounts to large business mailers and advertisers.

I urge you to review the impact any proposed plant consolidations or other "reforms" would have on postal customers in the _____________ area, and to share these concerns with the Postal Service.  Your voice must be heard. 

Thank you for your interest and consideration.

 

Sincerely,

(Provide Name and Address)

BACK TO TOP

 

The Red Bank Local, APWU, AFL-CIO, is a non-profit organization.

Hit Counter